Brick wall with chairs in Ethics of Ownership

Ethics of Ownership

Ethics of Ownership

In our ancient past, private ownership was the tool to suppress the power of monarchists, while today private owners of capital rule the world, enabling the Ethics of Ownership scale.

It could be concluded that ethical balance between the capital and the power has been lost. Thousands of wars throughout our history have enabled transformation of capital ownership among people and created new multilateral borders; nowadays borders do not exist and corporations are parallelly advocating and developing their own capital protecting mechanisms.

In such circumstances the government representatives resemble a marketing agency team which is not deployed to protect the account of the state, although the team members are on a state payroll, but to care about the interest of the owners of the capital or in other terms, government representatives are purposely neglecting the interest of majority and work force.

In addition, school curriculum and programmes support such scheme by alternating the “concept” of truth in the favor of private capital owners, purposely hiding the truth that countries, being the holders of capitals, do not exist anymore.

If countries don’t posses the majority of state capital and borders were deleted, is the workforce the only value they posses? If so, are those government representatives owners of people’s future for the account of private capital?

One Response